Article

The Hidden Dangers of AI in Corporate Environments, and How to Protect Your Organization

Artificial Intelligence (AI), including Generative AI (GenAI), is revolutionizing business and government operations. From automating workflows and enhancing data analysis to improving customer service and creating text, images, code, or even audio, AI is delivering powerful efficiency gains and driving innovation across industries. However, its adoption also brings a new range of risks: cybersecurity threats, privacy breaches, legal liabilities, reputational damage, and operational vulnerabilities.

This guide equips business leaders, IT/security professionals, and compliance officers with the knowledge and tools to harness AI's potential while safeguarding against its inherent dangers. Through real-world examples and proven frameworks, we highlight how to mitigate AI-related risks both internally and across the vendor ecosystem.

‍

AI in Cybercriminal Hands: Real-World Threats

Cybercriminals are weaponizing both traditional AI and GenAI to dramatically enhance the scope, sophistication, and speed of their attacks. These technologies allow bad actors to mimic legitimate behavior, exploit trust, and automate malicious actions with alarming precision. Below are the most pressing threats organizations face today:

Hyper-Realistic Phishing Campaigns: GenAI enables attackers to generate highly convincing emails, texts, and voicemails that appear to come from trusted internal sources.

In 2023, hackers used these techniques in an SMS phishing campaign against Activision, breaching HR systems and stealing sensitive employee data including emails, phone numbers, and salary details. These attacks are no longer riddled with spelling errors or obvious red flags, they’re tailored, timely, and terrifyingly effective.

Deepfake Impersonation Scams: As this technology becomes more accessible, expect to see deepfakes targeting finance teams, legal counsel, and customer service personnel, like CEOs or attorneys, to manipulate employees into transferring data or funds. In healthcare, such attacks are on the rise, and fewer than 50% of executives believe their organizations are ready to defend against them.

Adaptive Malware and Ransomware: Traditional malware often relies on known patterns to infect systems. AI changes the game, creating malware that adapts in real time to bypass detection, target high-value files, and even select optimal timing for deployment.

In January 2023, Yum! Brands faced such a threat, with AI-assisted ransomware shutting down 300 UK restaurants and compromising internal data. These next-gen attacks can rapidly scale and spread before human teams even realize what’s happening, prioritize sensitive data, and evade traditional security.

Model Evasion & Data Poisoning: Cybercriminals are also learning how to manipulate AI from the inside. They use techniques such as data poisoning, feeding malicious information into training datasets, and prompt injection, which involves crafting specific inputs to exploit vulnerabilities. These methods can cause GenAI models to leak sensitive data, misclassify content, or behave unpredictably. In the financial sector, nearly half of organizations reported experiencing prompt injection attacks that compromised proprietary insights or exposed confidential data. These attacks not only undermine trust in AI systems but also pose significant risks to compliance, data security, and decision integrity.

93% of security leaders now expect daily AI-driven attacks by 2025. The message is clear: proactive defense is no longer optional.

AI-based attacks are not just a future concern, they’re happening now. As open-source AI tools become more accessible, threat actors will continue to weaponize them in increasingly creative and damaging ways.

A notable example occurred in 2023 when a financially motivated threat group used a combination of deepfake audio and GenAI-generated emails to impersonate a multinational CEO. The attackers orchestrated a fake virtual meeting with a finance executive using a deepfake video overlay and AI voice cloning. The deception led to multiple fraudulent international wire transfers before the fraud was uncovered. This incident highlights how GenAI can be leveraged to bypass even well-trained employees and robust approval workflows, especially when it mimics authority, urgency, and familiarity.

Organizations must train staff not just to spot typos or grammatical errors, but to question even the most realistic messages and voice commands when something feels out of the ordinary. Proactive security awareness combined with technical defenses is critical to mitigating AI-driven deception at scale.

‍

Internal Risks: AI in Day-to-Day Operations

Integrating AI into core operations, whether for customer support, legal research, marketing, HR, or data analytics, can introduce serious internal risks that are often overlooked due to the convenience and automation AI brings:

Data Exposure from Overreach: AI systems require vast amounts of input data to function accurately. However, when employees upload confidential business information, like source code, internal reports, customer data, or legal documents, into GenAI platforms, that data can be inadvertently stored, analyzed, or used to improve the AI's future performance. If the AI is hosted by a third-party vendor, this can introduce major compliance and security issues. This risk materialized in 2023 when Samsung employees leaked proprietary code to ChatGPT, prompting a corporate ban on all GenAI tools.
Privacy Compliance Challenges: Many AI tools do not limit their data collection to what is strictly necessary. This 'data hunger' poses legal risks under privacy regulations like the GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA, which require data minimization and informed consent. Without controls, GenAI might process personal health data, financial information, or behavioral patterns that were never meant to be shared.

A notable example occurred when the Royal Free NHS Trust shared 1.6 million patient records with DeepMind without proper consent, resulting in regulatory penalties and reputational damage., violating GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, or other regulations. The UK’s Royal Free NHS Trust was fined after sharing 1.6 million patient records with DeepMind without proper consent.

Operational Overreliance: AI can streamline workflows, but relying too heavily on its outputs without human oversight can be disastrous. For example, using GenAI to draft legal documents or summarize regulatory content may result in inaccurate or misleading information being treated as fact.

In one case, a law firm presented AI-generated citations in a legal filing that referred to nonexistent court cases, leading to public embarrassment and court sanctions. AI should be viewed as a support tool, not a replacement for domain expertise or human judgment. can create critical flaws. A misinformed GenAI-generated legal document or an incorrect financial forecast can lead to litigation, penalties, or stalled operations.

Reputational Risks: AI systems, including GenAI, are prone to reflecting and amplifying the biases present in their training data. When deployed in customer service, HR decision-making, marketing, or public communications, biased or incorrect outputs can seriously undermine an organization’s credibility.

For instance, an AI chatbot offering inaccurate financial advice or a hiring algorithm unintentionally excluding qualified candidates from diverse backgrounds could result in public backlash, discrimination claims, and regulatory investigations. These incidents don’t just harm customer trust, they can trigger significant legal, financial, and reputational damage. This risk is especially severe in regulated sectors like healthcare, finance, legal, education, and government, where fairness, accuracy, and accountability are not optional, they’re required by law and public expectation.

Organizations must implement internal controls, restrict the use of external GenAI tools for sensitive tasks, and always include human oversight in AI-driven workflows.

‍

Third-Party and Vendor Risks

Organizations increasingly rely on AI solutions provided by third-party vendors to streamline operations, reduce development costs, and accelerate innovation. However, this convenience comes with serious external risks that, if unaddressed, can cascade into costly breaches, regulatory scrutiny, and reputational harm:

Vendor Data Breaches: When vendors do not maintain robust cybersecurity practices, your organization becomes exposed by proxy. In 2024, American Express experienced a breach via a third-party merchant processor that lacked proper safeguards for its GenAI-enabled platform. The result: customer names and card numbers were compromised. This underscores the reality that your vendor’s security posture is an extension of your own. The root cause? Weak security in a GenAI-enabled platform.
Lack of Transparency: Many GenAI vendors operate as 'black boxes'—offering little to no visibility into how their models are trained, what data sources are used, or how customer information is processed and retained. This lack of transparency makes it extremely difficult to assess compliance, evaluate bias, or enforce proper data governance. In healthcare, more than 50% of organizations report they do not monitor AI or GenAI usage across internal systems and third-party tools—creating significant risks of noncompliance with HIPAA and other privacy regulations. Without adequate oversight, sensitive data may be mishandled or shared in ways that violate regulatory mandates, leading to fines, breaches, and loss of public trust.
Ethical Missteps: Vendors that use biased, outdated, or unvetted training data can produce AI systems that discriminate or deliver inaccurate results. For example, a legal firm relying on a GenAI case analysis tool might unknowingly use recommendations that reinforce historical legal inequities, potentially affecting case outcomes, credibility, and legal standing. Without ethical audits and model accountability, such tools can introduce hidden bias and legal exposure. For instance, a legal firm using a GenAI tool for case analysis could unknowingly introduce bias into proceedings.
Financial and Regulatory Fallout: A single third-party AI failure can result in millions in damages. According to industry data, financial institutions now face an average breach cost exceeding $6 million, often triggered by third-party vulnerabilities. Beyond monetary loss, organizations face class-action lawsuits, regulatory penalties, and long-term damage to stakeholder confidence. These events are no longer rare, they’re expected.

Strong vendor vetting, contractual safeguards, and continuous oversight are critical to protecting organizational data and trust.

‍

Best Practices for Secure AI Use

To responsibly adopt and manage AI/GenAI, companies must integrate comprehensive safeguards.

Follow Established Frameworks:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Includes guidance tailored to GenAI policies and protections.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF): Offers a lifecycle-based approach to identify, map, manage, and mitigate AI-specific risks.
ISO/IEC 27001 & 27002: Standards for structured information security and access control.
ISO/IEC 42001: Global framework for governing AI tools throughout their lifecycle.
CIS Controls: Specific controls to manage access (Control 6) and monitor networks (Control 13).
Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs): Identify and mitigate AI data usage risks before deployment.

Strengthen Internal Controls:

Maintain an inventory of approved AI tools.
Restrict access and prohibit sensitive data inputs.
Require human validation for critical AI outputs.
Train employees on responsible AI usage.
Establish a governance program to oversee AI development, deployment, and decommissioning.

Secure the Vendor Supply Chain:

Verify cybersecurity compliance with ISO/NIST standards.
Demand transparency on training data and AI decision-making.
Ensure vendors have breach notification plans (e.g., 72-hour disclosure under GDPR).
Require bias audits and enforce penalties for noncompliance.
Review vendors and subvendors annually for AI-specific risk.

‍

AI Under Threat: How to Protect Your Business from GenAI Risks

Even top AI firms aren't immune. In 2023, OpenAI experienced a security breach in which hackers infiltrated internal communication systems and gained access to confidential discussions about AI model architecture and development strategies.

While no production data or customer information was reportedly compromised, the breach exposed sensitive intellectual property and highlighted vulnerabilities even within the world’s most advanced AI research organizations.

This incident serves as a wake-up call for businesses of all sizes, if security gaps can exist in leading AI labs, they can certainly exist elsewhere. It reinforces the critical need for robust cybersecurity, strict access controls, and continuous monitoring in every organization deploying or developing AI technologies.

Immediate actions to take:

Identify where AI and GenAI tools are used across your organization
Map AI data flows and perform PIAs, especially in regulated sectors
Adopt frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 42001, and AI RMF
Set up an AI governance team and red-teaming capabilities
Review all vendor contracts and require AI-specific safeguards

‍

How to Build a Resilient, Responsible AI Strategy

AI and GenAI are reshaping industries with unprecedented speed and scale. But with innovation comes accountability. Organizations must adopt a thoughtful, security-first mindset to protect data, people, and processes.

Start today by reviewing your AI use cases, updating acceptable-use policies, and preparing your workforce through training and governance.

Secnap is here to support your secure AI journey. As a trusted cybersecurity partner, Secnap helps organizations:

Assess risk exposure from internal and external AI tools
Build and enforce acceptable-use and data governance policies
Audit and monitor AI usage for compliance and ethical standards
Evaluate and secure third-party vendors and supply chains
Develop cybersecurity controls aligned with frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, CIS Controls, and the NIST AI RMF
Conduct Privacy Impact Assessments and internal vulnerability assessments

In today’s evolving landscape, the critical need for robust cybersecurity, strict access controls, and continuous monitoring cannot be overstated. These pillars are foundational to detecting AI misuse, preventing breaches, and maintaining compliance.

At the core of this protection strategy is CloudJacket MDR, Secnap’s managed detection and response platform. CloudJacket MDR delivers 24/7 monitoring, human-led threat hunting, and intelligent alert validation to help detect and contain even the most advanced AI-driven attacks. Our solution integrates seamlessly with cloud, hybrid, and on-prem environments, ensuring security across all layers of your infrastructure.

By taking these steps and working with a trusted partner like Secnap, and leveraging solutions like CloudJacket MDR, organizations can confidently embrace AI’s potential, turning risks into responsible innovation and long-term growth.

‍

Ready to secure your AI strategy? Schedule a consultation to explore how Secnap can keep your organization protected, compliant, and resilient.

Call (844) 638-7328 or visit our website: www.secnap.com

‍